Jurisdiction After A Family Settlement Agreement
In a 2014 probate case out of the Austin court of appeals, the executor appealed an order from the probate court requiring her to file an accounting. The executor claimed that since all the parties had entered into a family settlement agreement, the probate court no longer had jurisdiction to order the accounting.
Background
Three sisters signed a *family settlement agreement *dividing their mother's estate "as equally as possible." The executor was one of the sisters. She distributed the financial accounts equally. The mother also owned a farm on which the executor was living. She refused to sell the farm because she said she hoped it would regain value after a real-estate slump. Five years later the farm remained unsold. One of the other sisters asked the probate court to order an accounting which the judge ordered. He also indicated that after the accounting, he would consider a hearing to distribute the remaining assets. The executor appealed. The executor contended that the trial court had no probate jurisdiction because the Agreement supersedes the will. She argues that the Agreement *estopped *the sister from seeking probate remedies and barred the county court from enforcing probate remedies. After listing all the ways that the probate court retained jurisdiction after a will was filed and an executor appointed, the appeals court stated that the probate court would clearly have jurisdiction "(u)nless the **Family Settlement Agreement **imposed some legal impediment..." over jurisdiction. The court then went on to say that the Agreement did not mention jurisdiction and affirmed the probate court's order for an accounting. 427SW3d503.
The Future
The court's many references to the fact that the **Family Settlement Agreement **did not mention jurisdiction or how future disputes would be handled seems to imply that if the Agreement had been drawn to take jurisdiction away from the probate court, it would be upheld. That question will have to wait another day.
Was This Post Helpful
It may also be helpful to others so consider sharing it on Facebook, Twitter, Google+ or Linkedin by clicking the buttons.
Contact Us.
Background
Three sisters signed a *family settlement agreement *dividing their mother's estate "as equally as possible." The executor was one of the sisters. She distributed the financial accounts equally. The mother also owned a farm on which the executor was living. She refused to sell the farm because she said she hoped it would regain value after a real-estate slump. Five years later the farm remained unsold. One of the other sisters asked the probate court to order an accounting which the judge ordered. He also indicated that after the accounting, he would consider a hearing to distribute the remaining assets. The executor appealed. The executor contended that the trial court had no probate jurisdiction because the Agreement supersedes the will. She argues that the Agreement *estopped *the sister from seeking probate remedies and barred the county court from enforcing probate remedies. After listing all the ways that the probate court retained jurisdiction after a will was filed and an executor appointed, the appeals court stated that the probate court would clearly have jurisdiction "(u)nless the **Family Settlement Agreement **imposed some legal impediment..." over jurisdiction. The court then went on to say that the Agreement did not mention jurisdiction and affirmed the probate court's order for an accounting. 427SW3d503.
The Future
The court's many references to the fact that the **Family Settlement Agreement **did not mention jurisdiction or how future disputes would be handled seems to imply that if the Agreement had been drawn to take jurisdiction away from the probate court, it would be upheld. That question will have to wait another day.
Was This Post Helpful
Let's Work Together
Tell me what happened
Write to me through the contact form: what happened, roughly when, and who is involved. I read these myself. Writing means our first conversation can be about your situation instead of getting me up to speed.
This page is general information about Texas law. It is not legal advice about your situation, and reading it does not create an attorney–client relationship. These matters turn heavily on specific facts and specific dates, and the law has exceptions this page does not cover. You should not take, or refrain from taking, any action based on this page. Discuss your circumstances with an attorney who can advise you on them.